| disruptive |
.
diverse disruptive sustainable
Culture of partnership, passion, optimism and hard work through our diversity and inclusion efforts and looking to attract, retain and build a workforce representative of the diverse range of clients we represent. We have after all spent decades working alongside the top leadership of large global corporations who are deeply committed to drive change. The old, linear, waste generating, fossil fuel powered industrial system that has been crushing human rights for centuries needs to be destroyed and replaced with a new one. While we believe our direct environmental impact is small, we endeavor to implement efficiencies and environmental sustainability in our business practices.
.
| disruptive |
Markets work because of what Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter called "Creative Destruction". He describes it as a "process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one".
To address sustainability at the speed and scale required - which has been the life long focus of the company's founders - we need creative destruction on steroids!
The old, linear, waste generating, fossil fuel powered industrial system needs to be destroyed and replaced with a new one. Fortunately this is already underway in the energy sector, with fossil fuels now in terminal decline. But we need it in every sector nd every country, and we need it urgently. That's why we support large companies - that are already leaders in sustainability - to disrupt and transform their own markets. To make money at the expenses of competitors who are sustainability laggards. To accelerate, and then win, the market race to sustainability.
.
World View
In the evolving landscape of international law, disruptive and innovative litigation has emerged as a powerful tool for advancing human rights. This approach challenges traditional legal frameworks and leverages new strategies to address complex global issues. By pushing the boundaries of conventional litigation, advocates are able to bring attention to human rights violations and seek justice for victims in unprecedented ways.
One of the key aspects of this innovative approach is the use of technology. Digital evidence, such as satellite imagery and social media data, has become crucial in documenting human rights abuses. This evidence can be presented in international courts to hold perpetrators accountable. Additionally, blockchain technology is being explored to ensure the integrity and transparency of legal documents and evidence.
Another significant development is the rise of transnational litigation. Lawyers are increasingly filing cases in multiple jurisdictions to maximize the impact of their efforts. This strategy not only increases the chances of success but also puts pressure on governments and corporations to adhere to international human rights standards.
Public interest litigation has also seen a surge, with NGOs and advocacy groups playing a pivotal role. These organizations are bringing cases on behalf of marginalized communities, ensuring that their voices are heard in international forums. This collective action amplifies the call for justice and drives systemic change.
Moreover, innovative litigation strategies are being employed to address emerging human rights issues, such as climate change and digital privacy. By framing these issues as human rights concerns, litigators are able to push for stronger protections and accountability measures.
Collaborations between international law firms, academic institutions, and human rights organizations are fostering a new era of legal innovation. These partnerships are generating cutting-edge research and developing novel legal arguments that challenge the status quo.
In conclusion, disruptive and innovative international litigation is reshaping the fight for human rights. By embracing new technologies, transnational strategies, and collaborative efforts, advocates are breaking new ground and paving the way for a more just and equitable world.
Proto Cases
Climate Change Litigation. Cases like Juliana v. United States where young plaintiffs sued the U.S. government for failing to protect them from climate change. This case has pushed the boundaries of environmental law and highlighted the role of the judiciary in addressing climate issues.
Human Rights and Technology. The use of digital evidence in international courts, such as satellite imagery and social media data, to document human rights abuses. This innovative approach has been crucial in cases like those brought before the International Criminal Court.
Transnational Litigation. The Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. case, where Nigerian plaintiffs sued a multinational corporation in U.S. courts for human rights abuses committed abroad. This case has set precedents for holding corporations accountable for their actions globally.
Public Interest Litigation. Cases brought by NGOs and advocacy groups, such as the Brown v. Board of Education case in the U.S., which challenged racial segregation in schools and led to significant civil rights advancements.
Privacy and Data Protection. The Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner case, where an Austrian privacy activist challenged the transfer of personal data from the EU to the U.S., leading to the invalidation of the Safe Harbor agreement and the creation of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield.